When VR training simulators are discussed, the image of a VR headset is often the first thing that comes to mind. In the context of a training simulator, however, the headset represents just a vital yet minor piece of a much more extensive system. To illustrate this, envision a cutting-edge driving experience offered by a luxury automobile manufacturer. The vehicle acts as the final platform where users engage with the driving environment. But for the driving experience to be truly captivating, substantial effort must be dedicated to crafting every detail of each component and system to the highest standard of excellence, an intuitive interface, all meticulously designed to provide an unparalleled sensation of driving.
This analogy neatly aligns with maritime training simulators. Similar to the high-end driving experience, a training simulator for maritime scenarios must be intricately designed from the ground up to harness its potential fully. It should strive to deliver the utmost realistic training experience and capitalize on all the advantages the medium offers.
Traditionally, conventional maritime simulator systems aimed to faithfully replicate the physical environment of a ship's bridge. This approach brought numerous benefits, creating training that was remarkably lifelike. However, this approach was only viable due to technological limitations at the time. One drawback of this design was its substantial cost - both in terms of acquisition and operation - stemming from the system's complexity and the multitude of components involved. Additionally, its fixed physical location demanded ample space and incurred supplementary expenses for trainee travel and accommodation. This design also restricted simulator access, thereby limiting the volume of training sessions.
Given these factors, it's evident that simply attaching VR headsets to a conventional maritime training simulator system wouldn't fully exploit the potential advantages, such as cost reduction, expanded training capacity, and streamlined system architecture.
Our solution entails an integrated system where all components meld into a singular software interface. This approach mitigates the need for high-bandwidth internet access to run disparate cloud-based components, addressing concerns about user complexity. Moreover, it enhances cost-effectiveness and portability, as the solution can be deployed on a laptop.
In conclusion, the pivotal question is: "How effectively does our simulator system perform in practical scenarios?" This developmental journey has been both thrilling and challenging. Our level of achievement today owes much to the robust collaboration with academia, maritime research institutions, industry experts, and our customers. They provide profound insights into the critical facets a training simulator system must address to deliver maximum training value.
Two distinct studies, conducted by esteemed Norwegian universities, have concluded that in terms of training quality, there is no discernible distinction between the results of our simulator and conventional systems. In hindsight, this outcome is logical, as the primary operational contrast lies in how users interact with the bridge equipment.
Our primary goal over the past decade has been achieving parity between our simulator and conventional systems. With this milestone accomplished, we're now focused on further extending the advantages of transitioning to this platform. We're brimming with excitement about the novel possibilities and eager to introduce them to our clients.
